The exhibition includes both traditional favorites and
little-known works, like this crimson and cobalt vase, circa
1917.
Many evils have been committed in the name of eclecticism.
The precept that beautiful things go together was applied in excess
during the Nineteenth Century, when the rich had a misplaced faith
in the compatibility of Mexican saddlecloths, Boulle card tables
and Gothic whatnots. The fashion for Asia, far from being a spur to
simplicity, was often the pretext to add yet another style to the
decorating medley. Tiffany had a light touch, though, and he could
mix and match without making a room look theatrical or antiquarian.
The furnishings and decoration from some of his other important
commissions are also on display. His work for the Havemeyers is
represented by part of the staircase balustrade, 1890-91, for the
paintings gallery of their Upper East Side townhouse. The
balustrade has gilt bronze scrolls inset with pieces of
opalescent glass, and it shimmers even in the old black and white
photograph of the room that is reproduced in the catalog.
The gallery was sparsely furnished to show off the art more
effectively. But it was not a simple room. There were at least a
dozen patterns with two or three wallpapers, several Oriental
rugs, tiles, upholstery and portieres. The furniture, by
contrast, was noticeably understated. At a time when gilt carved
furniture was fashionable, the Havemeyers preferred Empire
Revival pedestal tables and chairs of the most basic design.
Tiffany's early career as a glass designer coincided with his
first decorating commissions. Glass was used for the sparkly
mosaics and wildflower chandeliers that were made for the
Havemeyers. Stained glass, a Western medium, was used in many of
Tiffany's exotic interiors.
Some of his best stained glass designs had an aquatic motif;
hence, the two panels on display from the "Four Seasons under the
Sea," 1895-1900, that depict in greens and browns the fish and
plant life at the bottom of the sea. The unevenly rippled glass
contributes to the murkiness to suggest the visual distortion
caused by the currents and uneven light.
The designers who worked for Tiffany were encouraged to study
from nature. One later recalled that he was sent to the Bahamas
to spend his time in a glass bottom boat, looking at marine life.
The stained glass lamp with a lily pad motif, 1899-1910,
likewise, shows the green leaves of floating lily pads. Here, the
depiction is more abstract, with the leaves simple round discs
and the stems swirls of a lighter green.

Tiffany designed this armchair, 1879, for his first important
decorating project.
The exhibition abounds in peacock tails and dragonflies, two
popular motifs from the 1880s and 1890s. But other works are harder
to place, even though they date from the same period. The fishbowl
vase, 1893-96, is a case in point. Thematically, it is one of the
many works that highlight Tiffany's indebtedness to Japanese art.
But it is impressive as an example of virtuoso illusionism; it
really looks, at first glance, like an ordinary fishbowl, with the
swimming goldfish making small ripples in the water.
Tiffany was not a craftsman. Unlike William Morris, who learned a
new skill every few years, Tiffany was not a perpetual
apprentice, who spent his day reading old manuals and personally
trying out new techniques. But he was very good at making things
happen and he always hired the best people. He was, moreover, a
perfectionist, who, according to legend, toured the workshops
with his cane raised to destroy any vase or pot he did not like.
In Europe, Tiffany glass was exhibited at many of the most
important fairs and collected by museums. Although proud of his
success overseas, Tiffany continued to emphasize the home market.
Thus, he was not especially anxious when European sales of his
work declined in the early 1900s.
He must have been pained, however, by the waning interest in this
country. Many artists fade in popularity, but Tiffany's
reputation collapsed. For many years, beginning in the decade
before his death, his work was classed with the clutter and
furbelows of the previous century. Even among those who should
have known better, Tiffany was irredeemably Victorian.
Possibly, this rejection was not only artistic, but also
personal. Tiffany's optimism and ostentation, not to mention his
indifference to politics, might have been off-putting in the
1920s and 1930s. "We are going after the money there is in art,
but the art is there all the same," he said at the start of a
career, notably deficient in self-torment and adversity.
The prejudice against Tiffany was widespread, though it is
sometimes, perhaps unfairly, associated with the Museum of Modern
Art (MoMA). Beginning in the 1950s, a few pieces were on rotating
display in the museum's newly opened design galleries. This
recognition was, however, far from a total embrace of his legacy.
There was a parsing quality to the museum's representation of
Tiffany. His contribution to Art Nouveau was squarely in bounds
because Art Nouveau anticipated the simplification and
stylization of the 1920s.
The type of piece that fits the museum's collection guidelines is
the simple ocher vase, 1902, that is decorated with white
flowers. No "trickery" or illusionism was used for the
decoration.
But then there was all the other stuff - the mushroom inkstands
and mosaic clocks, the pieces that had no place in the museum's
collections because they violated the museum's rule against
realistic or showy ornament. In the genealogy of Modern design,
Tiffany was a first cousin once or twice removed.
Paradoxically, one of the most influential Tiffany revivalists
was a curator at MoMA. Edgar Kaufmann (1910-89), an architecture
critic, worked in the design department from the 1930s to the
1950s, where he organized shows on subjects like Danish
bookbinding, and wrote layman's pamphlets on Modern design.
(What is Modern Design? is a representative title.)
During these years, he built up a significant collection of
Tiffany glass. Although he succeeded in donating one piece to the
museum, his interest was largely a private matter. In many ways,
Kaufmann was no different than any other office worker who
pursues in his off hours a hobby of little interest to his
colleagues.

Tiffany's first ambition was to be an artist. This "View of
Cairo," circa 1872, dates from his youthful travels in North
Africa.
Childless, he displayed his collection without any of the
usual precautions. The precious wares were placed on the floor,
lined against the walls of the living room. He was an adventurous
collector with a rare taste for the lava vases, the molten,
irregularly shaped pieces that were unappreciated during Tiffany's
lifetime.
Other revivalists included the furniture designer Edward Wormley
(1908-95) and the scholar Robert Koch (1918-2003), who wrote his
dissertation on Tiffany's stained glass. Lillian Nassau
(1899-1995), who was for many years the most important Tiffany
dealer, dated her passion back to the 1930s, when she saw the
beautiful lamps broken up so the metal could be melted down for
scrap.
Institutionally, the Tiffany revival owed a lot to the provincial
and second-tier museums. The Morse Museum, which was founded in
the early 1940s for the preservation of Tiffany's work, was
located near Orlando, Fla., which was then something of an
agricultural backwater. And one of the first Tiffany
retrospectives was conducted in a brownstone across the street
from the MoMA, at the newly founded Museum of Contemporary Crafts
(today, the Museum of Arts & Design).
The big museums seem to have played a less influential role
during these years. This was true even of the museums with
historic Tiffany collections that were, in part, on permanent
view.
A white-spotted brown vase, 1893-96, which was probably inspired
by the Native American baskets that Tiffany collected, is one of
the nearly five dozen pieces the Havemeyers gave to The
Metropolitan Museum of Art in the 1890s. Another is the rare
glass plaque that suggests the petal-like design of a sand
dollar, 1893.
The rehabilitation Tiffany's image was completed so many years
ago that it is difficult to imagine how his work could ever have
fallen into disgrace - or into what one journalist called the
"gutter of derision."
Visitors to this exhibition are in for a treat, thanks to the
efforts of those who rescued the reputation of one of America's
great designers.
The Toledo Museum of Art is at 2445 Monroe Street at Scottwood
Avenue. For information, 419-255-8000 or www.toledomuseum.org.