: Floral motifs are represented in the arts of many cultures and
are ubiquitous in carpet design.
"Floral Perspectives in Carpet Design," at The Textile Museum
August 27-February 6, examines this phenomenon from three
perspectives - spiritual, cultural and artistic - as rendered in
the designs of Seventeenth to Nineteenth Century Indian, Chinese,
Central Asian, Persian and Turkish carpets.
The exhibition explores cultural preferences for the
representation of flowers, the variety of floral motifs and their
transfer from culture to culture. Included are 12 carpets drawn
from the museum's collections, many of which were collected by
the museum's founder, George Hewitt Myers. Most of the carpets
were produced for the court and represent some of the oldest and
finest examples of their tradition.
While certain treatments of floral motifs are often associated
with specific cultures, the exhibit explores the cross-cultural
influences that are also at work. For example, the lotus scroll
is a motif commonly associated with Chinese art, but it is
actually the culmination of influences from outside sources.
The leaf or vine scroll was well known and used in the
Greco-Roman world and in the first millennium, some Chinese
artists saw this undulating leaf scroll as an effective framework
for placing a floral motif. It eventually became the foundation
for the lotus and the peony, both popular flowers in Chinese art.
Islamic artists and weavers used a similar leaf form, but
arranged it differently - giving rise to the arabesque, a form of
vegetal ornament unique to Islamic art.
From the mid-Seventeenth Century onward, flowers permeated Mughal
art in India. The Mughal floral style is unique and born from an
amalgamation of Mughal/Persian and European designs, most notably
botanical drawings. European drawings often depict the full cycle
of a plant in a single page, from buds to fully formed flowers.
Close inspection of floral motifs in the Mughal carpet tradition
reveals a similar treatment of individual flowers. While this
particular device was incorporated into the Mughal artistic
tradition, artists took much license in small embellishments of
flowers, leading to detailed images that did not always translate
to botanically correct representations.
The passion for flowers and floral compositions in Ottoman art
was also very strong, but where Mughal art displayed a preference
for naturalistic floral representations, Ottoman artists showed a
strong preference for more stylized, geometric compositions of
common Ottoman floral motifs.
A related symposium, the 27th Annual Rug convention, "Indian
Textile Traditions: Exchanges and Transformation," will be
October 15-17. Speakers include Dr Joseph M Dye III, E. Rhodes
and Leona B. Carpenter Curator of South Asian and Islamic Art,
Virginia Museum of Fine Arts; Steven Cohen, independent textile
historian, London; and Jeff Spurr, cataloger for Islamic Art, Aga
Khan Program of Islamic Architecture, Fine Arts Library, Harvard
University.
The museum, at 2320 S Street, NW in Washington, D.C., is open
Monday-Saturday, 10 am to 5 pm, and Sunday, 1 to 5 pm. Admission
is free. For information, 202-667-0441.