|
| |

"Bilhah Abigail Levy Franks," attributed to Gerardus Duyckinck. Manhattan, circa 1735. Oil on canvas from the collection of the American Jewish
Historical Society, Waltham, Mass., and New York City. Abigail Levy Franks wrote
a series of lively and intimate letters to her son living in London. These
document the important role Jews played in the cultural and commercial life of
colonial New York.
Cross Roads and Cross Rivers
Diversity in Colonial New York
By Kathleen Eagen Johnson

TARRYTOWN, N.Y. — Between 1680 and 1750, a surprisingly
diverse group of people converged at the Upper Mills of Philipsburg Manor. This
site, constructed and operated by enslaved Africans, served as one of two
commercial centers on a manor consisting of 52,000 acres along the east shore of
the lower Hudson River. The people who lived and traded here were brought
together, in part, by the varied business ventures of Frederick Philipse
(1626-1702) and his son Adolph (1665-1750). According to historians, the
activities of the Philipse family and other merchant/land speculators helped
create colonial New York’s culturally diverse society.
Pursuit of trade introduced a varied group of partners, some
willing and some forced, to this landscape. In New York, the commercial activity
that had initially involved Native Americans and Europeans soon grew to include
people who had once lived in Africa and Latin America. This double stamp of
commerce and cultural diversity has marked New York since its very beginnings.
Images of stockaded villages built by the Hudson River’s
Mahikan tribe and exotic animals represent European preoccupation with Native
Americans and the fur trade. The territories controlled by the Sint Sinks,
Wappingers, Minnessincks, and other groups are indicated on the map as well.
For centuries before the arrival of the Dutch, the
Wekquaesgeeks farmed, hunted, and fished near the confluence of the Hudson and
Pocantico Rivers. Contact with Europeans initially revolved around trade: Native
Americans exchanged furs for manufactured goods.
Europeans coveted the territory that Native Americans
controlled and negotiated its purchase. Rarely did either party fully understand
and agree upon the rights and limits of such transactions, in part due to
cultural differences regarding the concept of land ownership. In this locale,
during the 1640s, relations between the Wekquaesgeeks, other River Indians, and
Europeans grew violent as cultures and economic interests clashed. Soon after,
Frederick Philipse acquired land from the Wekquaesgeeks and Sint Sinks.
The Dutch Imprint
A passion for trade enticed the earliest Dutch settlers to
New Netherland, later called New York. The colony was founded in 1609 by a
merchant corporation, the Dutch West India Company, rather than by a country.
Like other Europeans, the Dutch were religious as well as
commercial imperialists. They did not see cultural diversity as a source of
strength, but rather as a potential source of chaos and curse. Primarily
Protestant Calvinists, citizens of the Netherlands were particularly sensitive
to this issue. They had just ended centuries of domination by fighting a
religious war with Spain, a Catholic country. The Board of Directors of the
Dutch West India Company preferred that the population of New Netherland, an
infant and tender colony, be composed only of Dutch settlers, and thus remain
homogeneous. That was not to be, because the Dutch did not settle there in large
numbers.
In 1664, the Netherlands surrendered political control of New
Netherland to England. The mother country chalked up the loss of New Netherland
as a failed experiment and concentrated on exploiting other colonies they
considered more successful. But in New York, Dutch cultural domination did not
end quickly. In rural areas and in towns such as Albany, the Dutch language was
spoken well into the Nineteenth Century, living on as an integral part of
worship in the Dutch Reformed Church. Dutch customs, foodways, farming
practices, and other forms of cultural expression survived as well. New York
architecture and furnishings bore a distinctive Dutch stamp for decades, if not
centuries.
The Philipses: A Case Study
Frederick Philipse conducted business in New York under both
Dutch and English rule. He immigrated to New Netherland in 1653, the foreman of
construction for the Dutch West India Company. Through shrewd and diversified
trading, advantageous marriages, and political skill, he became one of the
richest men in the colony. Frederick Philipse’s first wife, Margaret
Hardenbroeck, who conducted her own international shipping business, and their
son Adolph, were partners in the family’s varied enterprises.
Margaret Hardenbroeck was a wealthy widow when she married
Philipse. Through her own efforts and through those of her extended family,
Hardenbroeck enjoyed access to a vast network of merchants in Europe. Her second
husband found these connections a highly attractive benefit of marriage.
Margaret Hardenbroeck serves as a classic example of the
indomitable Dutch female trader. Under Dutch law and custom, women enjoyed more
autonomy and economic opportunity than they did under English rule. Female and
male children inherited equally, and females could act as individuals in
business transactions and own real estate separate from that of their husbands.
This and other freedoms were in direct contrast to English
custom and law. Even after the Dutch colony’s conquest, women continued to
work with their husbands as partners in business and also ran their own shops,
farms, and inns. Adoption of English law gradually eroded away the former
independence of Dutch women, leaving them more dependent on their fathers or
husbands.
Margaret and Frederick’s son Adolph, an active merchant,
followed in his parents’ footsteps. To secure his power base, he also held
important political posts in colonial New York’s government. Adolph was the
owner, albeit largely absentee, of the property known as Philipsburg Manor,
Upper Mills.
The Philipses And International Trade
The Philipses inserted themselves into the international
trading network that dominated the Atlantic world, mastered its mechanics, and
comprehended its risks. They understood the European system of exporting raw
materials from far-flung colonies and, in turn, creating markets in these
colonies for manufactured goods and other commodities. The Upper Mills property
was a vital part of the Philipses’ worldwide business.
The Philipses mitigated risk by enlisting partners, most
often other New York merchants, when underwriting venture cargoes. They
cultivated an extensive trading network and opened new markets for eager sellers
of commodities such as tobacco. With limited success, Frederick Philipse worked
around monopolies established by the government. He, like other New York
merchants, also speculated in land, which was viewed as a long-term investment.
Shipping records reveal the types of cargo carried on
Philipse family ships. Furs, whale oil, and tobacco left New York and Virginia
for Europe. Flour, hardtack, livestock, and timber traveled to the West Indies
where plantation owners concentrated on producing sugar cane to the exclusion of
most other crops. In return, they offered sugar, cocoa, sassafras, and logwood.
Manufactured goods traveled from Europe for consumption in the colonies. Exotic
painted cottons and spices came from the East Indian Ocean. Human cargo arrived
from the West Indies, West Africa, and Madagascar.
The extensive system of trade created by the seafaring Dutch
afforded wealthy residents of the colony well-appointed surroundings. These
objects belonged to the Van Cortlandts, another early New York family involved
in international shipping.
Frederick Philipse As Slave Trader
Briefly in the 1680s and significantly in the 1690s,
Frederick Philipse actively pursued the slave trade. On occasion, he imported
small groups of Africans from the West Indies and from present-day Angola. Some
of these enslaved people were sold in other colonies, some came to New York, and
some worked for the Philipses in Manhattan, on the Manor, or on their ships.
Philipse was one of several New Yorkers who circumvented the
official routes for the importation of enslaved people by dealing with an
enclave of pirates who used Madagascar, an island off the east coast of Africa,
as a base of operation. These pirates found the port of New York a safe haven
under the governorship of Benjamin Fletcher, who profited from his business
relationship with them. Fletcher’s successor as colonial governor, however,
did not continue to offer the warm welcome pirates had previously enjoyed and
made sure that their partners in New York paid the price.
Frederick Philipse suffered for his involvement in the
Madagascar slave trade. A ship captain in his employ narrowly missed hanging;
Philipse lost a ship and two valuable cargoes; and he and his son were barred
from holding provincial office for years, a blow that severely threatened the
family’s commercial power base. Their punishment had nothing to do with the
moral issues of the slave trade, but resulted from his failure to comply with
the British Empire’s maritime laws.
English Rule
In 1664, England had conquered Dutch New Netherland, a
troublesome foreign competitor in the midst of England’s American colonies.
The English quickly realized that the unique Dutch imprint was not easily
erased. Conversely, the Dutch, as well as French and Jewish merchants,
understood the value of learning the English language and legal modes in order
to promote their own businesses. As the controlling minority, the English found
themselves in a curious situation of integrating their former commercial foes
into the English trading network.
The adoption of English as the official language proved
culturally wrenching. Since all news and commercial notices were printed in
English, fluency became a prerequisite for success. Although the abandonment of
Dutch was bemoaned, by the 1740s the young in Manhattan were speaking English as
their primary language. As Dutch people in an English-dominated world, the
Philipses realized that it would be prudent to cultivate the support of the
crown in order to further their business ventures, although they certainly did
not refrain from circumventing English law. Political allegiance may have become
more palatable when the Netherlandish Stadtholder William and his wife Mary
ascended the British throne in 1689.
Are these objects symbols of political loyalty? The use and
display of objects bearing symbols of British monarchs represented recognition
of, if not allegiance to, the British empire. Archeologists working on at
Philipsburg site recovered these fragments, here displayed with a related whole
example. This stoneware, made for an overtly British market, came from
Continental Europe and illustrates the international character of Philipse
family trade.
Native Americans And The Fur Trade
The furs and lands that fell in the purview of Native
Americans were highly desired by Europeans. Frederick Philipse dealt with two
groups of Native Americans: the River Indians of the lower Hudson Valley and the
Iroquois of Northern and Western New York State. Furs fetched high prices in
Europe where deep wilderness had long been depleted. In exchange, Philipse and
other traders offered Native Americans wampum, guns, metal tools, cloth, and
cheap ceramics.
As southern New York became depleted of furs, New York
merchants turned a covetous glance to the powerful Iroquois Confederacy and the
fur-rich lands under its control. Albany merchants lobbied the government and
were granted a monopoly in dealing with the Iroquois. Frederick Philipse
circumvented the ban by establishing a house in Albany run by his father-in-law.
Manhattan’s Many Artisans
During the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, immigrants
from the British Isles, Scandinavia, France, the Low Countries, and present-day
Germany entered Manhattan and the lower Hudson Valley. The newcomers saw this
frontier as a place of opportunity.
By the end of the Seventeenth Century, nearly 30 families
with Dutch, German, French, Walloon (Belgian-French) and English surnames lived
on the Manor. During the Eighteenth Century, the manor prospered. In 1779, a tax
list recorded 174 taxpayers, or a population of almost 1,000 people. Personal
histories suggest that many of these people had lived elsewhere in the American
colonies before settling on the manor of Philipsburg.
Some Europeans worked as artisans in Manhattan, producing
structures, furniture, and tools. These artisans used their skills to meet the
needs of a burgeoning merchant class. The individual artifacts created often
proclaimed their makers’ geographic origins as seen in the style and
construction techniques used. The physical characteristics of objects also speak
to the tastes and preferences of their owners. The diversity of forms
underscores the culturally pluralistic society present in early New York.
Africans And Atlantic Creoles, Enslaved And Free
The very first blacks who arrived in New Netherland may not
have come directly from Africa, nor were they necessarily enslaved. Historians
refer to these people as Atlantic Creoles because they lived on both the east
and west shores of the Atlantic Ocean and, as a group, were of mixed ancestry.
Middlemen in trade between Europe, Africa, and North and South America, they
served as merchants, translators, and sailors. Their tongue served as the common
language of trade. Jan Rodrigues and a handful of other Atlantic Creoles in New
Netherland were free, but not all were. Two enslaved men belonging to the
Philipse family were Atlantic Creoles; their stories reveal information about
the role of Atlantic Creoles in world culture and trade.
Nicholas Cartagena’s last name suggests that he, or his
ancestors, came from the city of the same name located in present-day Colombia.
Enslaved, he worked as an interpreter on a Philipse vessel bound for Madagascar.
There, without prior approval, the captain of the ship sold Cartagena to
Philipse’s slave supplier.
Jack, whose name was common among Atlantic Creoles, escaped
from the manor of Philipsburg during the mid-1690s and may have returned to
Africa aboard a privateer. Philipse described him in a letter as a
"remarkable fellow" who was probably headed toward the Persian Gulf by
way of Rhode Island. Philipse anticipated that Jack might find employment there
as a sailor.
The Residents Of The Upper Mills
The initial group of enslaved people at Philipsburg may well
have come from the Kongo Kingdom of Angola. In 1685, nearly 150 Africans boarded
Philipse’s ship, the Charles, at the port of Soyo. These people were
probably prisoners of war from the Kongo. The ship first stopped in Barbados,
where 105 were sold. The voyage ended in Rye, where the remaining nine slaves
disembarked.
B’Kongo (meaning "of the Kongo") people probably
served as the imprint group for the African community at Philipsburg Manor. The
B’Kongo culture was highly structured and sophisticated. The B’Kongo people
were known as successful rice farmers. While their rice cultivation skills were
not immediately transferable to the Hudson valley because of its colder climate,
their general knowledge of growing and processing grain was. They were also, as
a culture, skilled in the art of blacksmithing.
One of the most intriguing aspects of B’Kongo culture was
its open and accepting theology, one that centered on ancestor worship and
intercession by a group of deities who answer to a supreme deity. Some B’Kongo
people also incorporated aspects of Christianity, introduced by the Portuguese
in the form of Roman Catholicism during the fifteenth century, into their
religious belief system without diluting their faith.
Between 1680 and 1750, most of the people who lived on this
site were African or of African descent. The enslaved Africans constructed,
operated, and resided on a complex that consisted of a mill, manor house, bake
house, slave house, wharves, and a church. Dina, Caesar, and Venture, among
others, labored as millers, bakers, sailors, dairy workers, coopers, and
servants. They and the other 20 enslaved men, women and children living here at
the time of Philipse’s death in 1750 formed a community. The naming patterns,
such as Sampson and Little Sampson, and Diamond and Little Diamond, suggest that
families lived together at the Upper Mills.
Cultural Conflict And Accommodation
Among the most severe examples of racial strife and violence
in colonial New York were the events surrounding the so-called slave rebellion
of 1741. What began as an arson investigation evolved into a witch-hunt marked
by racism. In a search to find those responsible for setting a series of fires
that swept Manhattan, dozens of poor whites and blacks were accused, tried, and
subsequently imprisoned or executed. Among them was Cuffee, an enslaved man
owned by Adolph Philipse. Cuffee was accused of setting fire to a city warehouse
owned by Adolph’s brother, convicted, and burned at the stake. Members of the
provincial government, fearing class war, used the event to promote racism as a
way of driving a wedge between servant-class whites and enslaved and free
blacks. Also a result of the incident, New York’s Colonial government enacted
an extremely harsh slave code.
While some of the contention that marked colonial New York
can be attributed to its wide cultural mix, there was cultural blending as well.
Pinkster, a spring holiday celebrated in the Hudson Valley during the Eighteenth
and early Nineteenth Centuries, drew on both African and Dutch traditions.
Ostensibly marking Pentecost, a Christian holiday, its practice in the Hudson
Valley included such Africanisms as the naming of a king, dancing in Kongo
style, and shelters decorated with vines and leaves.
Dissolution Of The Upper Mills
In 1750, the death of one individual, Adolph Philipse, caused
major disruption at the Upper Mills. His death marked the end of direct family
interest in this site and the break-up of its African community.
The family tried to sell the property – including the
miller, boatman, and some of the other slaves – as a package. This was a
common practice in the Eighteenth Century. There were no takers. The enslaved
people who composed the Upper Mills community died, were sold, or went to live
at other Philipse family properties. Slavery as an institution would continue in
New York until statewide manumission was achieved in 1827.
A passion for trade laid the groundwork for early New York’s
culturally diverse population. New Netherland was founded by a corporation,
rather than by a political entity. Initially, the directors of Dutch West India
Company imagined a homogeneous, all-Dutch colony, but lack of interest in
migration on the part of their countrymen crushed that dream. Thus, achieving
economic success demanded a variety of settlers.
Commerce and cultures mixed in Seventeenth-Century New York.
The Wekquaesgeeks and other River Indians, who had lived here long before the
arrival of the Europeans, traded highly desired furs and land with the
newcomers. Artisans and laborers from many parts of northern Europe flowed into
Manhattan. A merchant class developed, one composed of Dutch, English, and
French traders as well as Spanish, Portuguese, and German-speaking Jews.
Tenant farmers of northern European descent were enticed to
live throughout the colony; many came to live on the Manor of Philipsburg. The
first blacks who entered New Netherland were not all enslaved, but soon race and
slavery were inextricably linked. Enslaved people came from parts of West
Africa, Madagascar, and the West Indies. Some were native born. They labored as
artisans, sailors, farmers, and servants. Colonial New York, a frontier society,
simultaneously exhibited cultural segregation, blending, and conflict.
For most white and black colonials living in New York, shared
race, religion, language, and class ranked as more critical factors than did
allegiance to a particular country or ethnic group. Most early New Yorkers did
not nurture a strong, lifelong attachment to one ethnic or tribal group, in part
because large numbers of people did not immigrate together, a more common
demographic pattern in the nineteenth century. Eventually, many colonists
defined themselves by taking a stand for or against political allegiance with
England, a decision that tended to cut across ethnic and, to a certain extent,
racial lines.
The Fate Of The Philipses And Their Partners
Prosperity resulting from the mercantile success of Frederick
and Adolph Philipse allowed subsequent generations of the family to pursue a
gentry lifestyle. The Philipses were now more English than Dutch in orientation;
this shift would lead them to remain loyal to the crown during the American
Revolution. At the war’s conclusion, they were among those attainted of
treason by the New York State Legislature. Their personal possessions and real
estate were seized and sold. The Philipses’ empire and the Manor of
Philipsburg as an official entity were destroyed.
What happened to the willing and unwilling business
associates of the Philipse family? Manhattan remained closely tied to the crown,
in part due to its commercial ties to the mother country. The inhabitants of
Westchester County, a demilitarized zone between Loyalist New York City and
largely Rebel upstate, suffered loss of life and property. Tenant farmers were
allowed to buy land formerly attached to the manor. New York’s Commissioners
of Forfeiture turned over the manor church, the Old Dutch Church, to the
congregation. Well-connected Patriots bought the Upper Mills.
During the Revolution, political affiliation often cut across
ethnic lines. Native Americans in the colony of New York aligned themselves with
both sides. Most Jews fought as Patriots. British troops used the promise of
freedom to entice enslaved Africans to leave Patriot owners and to join their
ranks. Sometimes freedom was granted; often times it was not. The irony of the
Declaration of Independence, a document stating that all men are created equal,
was not lost on Africans.
"Cross Roads &Cross Rivers: Diversity In Colonial
New York" will run through August 15, 2000, although the exhibition will be
closed during January, February and weekdays in March. To order the exhibition
catalog, telephone 914/631-3992, ext.18. To learn more about Historic Hudson
Valley’s historic properties and programs, call 914/631-8200.
 |