With tongue in cheek, Winterthur has headlined its latest  ceramics exhibition “Made in China” – a label all too familiar to  modern consumers. From a modern age when Americans would be  barefoot and unkempt without inexpensive Chinese shoes and  hairdryers, visitors are brought back to the time when having  Chinese Export porcelain on the table was a sign of wealth and  status.   “In choosing the title ‘Made in China’ – which is stamped on so  many cheap goods that come into the country now – I want people  to understand that the Chinese have a long tradition of making  things for the Western market,” points out assistant curator of  ceramics Ron Fuchs II, who put together the exhibition and wrote  the accompanying catalog in collaboration with David S. Howard.  “I want people to gain an appreciation of the beauty of Chinese  Export porcelain and to recognize how skilled the potters were  and how prized these pieces were because of their exotic origins  in Asia.”   The 150 examples on display through May 15 are all gifts or loans  from the collection of Leo and Doris Hodroff. Through the  couple’s generosity, Mr Fuchs is the dedicated curator for the  Hodroff holdings at Winterthur, and he notes, “It’s one of the  largest private collections of export porcelain in existence  right now.” The museums in Minneapolis, Minn., and Palm Beach,  Fla. – cities where the collectors live – have also benefited  from their gifts, but Winterthur has been singled out because of  its focus on the decorative arts. Although the exhibition officially covers a 300-year span,1550-1850, the vast majority of the pieces on display date to thelate Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. During that period,Chinese Export porcelain was the ne plus ultra ofdinnerware, and its perfection and translucence impelled ceramicinnovation in the West. Potteries in Germany, France and Englandaspired and copied its attributes, and begged, borrowed or stolenew formulas that promised to achieve them. Export porcelain couldbe more valuable than silver plate on the table, a fact notsurprising in light of where it came from and the long journey itmade as part of the China Trade.   The exhibition and its catalog open with a discussion of “What is  Porcelain,” that magical commodity that everyone sought to  emulate. The main ingredients – fine white China clay and China  stone, a feldspathic rock – both derive from the breakdown of  granite but possess different qualities. When combined, the two  form a material that can be easily shaped and continues to hold  its shape when fired at high temperature (up to 2,462 degrees  Fahrenheit). Because of the silica in the mixture, the resulting  product fuses with the heat, making it hard, translucent and  producing a ringing tone when struck.   A charming series of watercolor paintings in this section  illustrates the process as performed by the Chinese, from  gathering the clay to packing the final product. Mr Fuchs says,  “The Chinese produced sets of watercolors showing porcelain  production, tea cultivation, silk production and rice  cultivation. They were meant for export, because, presumably,  Europeans were curious how these things were made.” The next  portion of the exhibition makes it clear why traders never had  the opportunity to view these activities in person on their  journeys to the East.   Imports from the Far East first arrived in Europe after a long  overland journey on the “Silk Road.” The quest for a direct route  to the spices and luxury goods of Asia impelled the flurry of  global exploration in the Fifteenth Century, which led to  Columbus running into the Americas. The Portuguese, making the  long journey around Africa, were first to arrive in China in  1517, and later established a trading base at Macao. By the  beginning of the Seventeenth Century, both the Dutch and the  English had established East India companies to facilitate the  trade of their respective countries with China.   China, for its part, strictly limited contact between its people  and the barbarians from abroad. Early on, Western ships were  allowed to dock at Macao, Amoy (modern-day Xiamen) or Canton, but  after 1729, trade was restricted to Canton, where foreign  merchants were confined to the “hongs” along the Pearl River,  where they lived, worked and stored products for export. The  scene is documented on a punch bowl, circa 1780-1790, in the  exhibition, whose decoration depicts the hongs identified by the  national flags of the trading companies. Now highly prized by  collectors, these bowls were popular souvenirs to take back home  after a “tour of duty” in Canton.   With an even longer journey to make, the United States did not  have a single East India company with a monopoly on voyages to  the Far East. Mr Fuchs explains, “There were ways to get around  it, but in general, if things from China made it to England, they  came via the East India Company. The American China Trade  operated very differently. Americans sent independent ships,  usually financed by a consortium of merchants, because very few  people could afford to do that on their own. There does seem to  have been an American hong, because on some punchbowls or  paintings, you see an American flag.”   The central section of “Made in China” focuses on the multitude  of export porcelain forms for dining, drinking and decorating.  What dishes were ordered gradually changed in response to changes  in diet and eating customs. By the Seventeenth Century, upper  class diners no longer wanted to share food or plates in the  “family style” manner of the Middle Ages. Matching services  developed with specific forms for holding different foods and  individual plates for each diner.   Tea and coffee pots and cups were only necessary when drinking  those beverages became popular in Europe. One of the earliest  exhibits, a blue and white handled pot made 1575-1625, may have  been used for wine or tea, first recorded in Europe in 1610 and  regularly imported by midcentury. The silver repairs to the  handle and spout demonstrate the value of the porcelain, still  rare in the Western world at that time.   The Chinese became famous for their made-to-order patterns, often  incorporating a family’s coat of arms. Mr Fuchs comments, “One of  my favorite objects in the whole exhibit is an armorial porcelain  plate that was made in the 1720s for an English family. What is  really extraordinary is that the original order survives. We  actually have a small sheet of vellum that has the coat of arms  painted on one side and on the back is written in English, ‘I  want two tea sets with my coat of arms.’ Below the words in  English is the text translated into Chinese. So it’s this  wonderful example of how European merchants communicated with the  Chinese merchants and eventually the Chinese potters themselves.  There once must have been documents like this for every order,  but few of them have survived. The original is still in the  family in England, but they have graciously allowed us to make  photographic reproductions of it.” Not all export porcelain was utilitarian. In Western eyes,the exotic painted decoration executed in China was as admired asthe porcelain material itself. The exhibition includes twofive-piece garnitures with blue and white designs. One wasretrieved from the wreck of a Chinese junk, probably bound for theDutch trading center of Batavia (modern-day Jakarta, Indonesia).Goods purchased from enterprising Chinese traders at such portsserved as a less expensive supplement to the wares picked up byEuropean ships in China.   Rarest of all export porcelain decorative wares were figurines.  The examples in the Hodroff collection include purely Chinese  personages, such as a blanc-de-chine Guanyin or a set of the  Eight Immortals with brightly painted robes. Lack of information  about their religious significance apparently did not discourage  European buyers from purchasing and admiring the figures as  conversation pieces in the salon. Animals also made an  appearance. A colorful rooster, circa 1750, displays a high  degree of naturalism in its modeling. A pair of black dogs with  white spots, circa 1770, on the other hand, is an interesting  cross between English mantel ornaments and the foo dogs of China.   Most unusual are the Chinese-made figurines representing  Europeans, such as a hatted man riding a diminutive horse made  circa 1700-1720 in Dehua, a city known for figure modeling. Also  on view are figures of a European merchant and lady, circa 1740 –  wearing what the Chinese surely considered their characteristic  national costume – which come from a small group taken from the  same molds that may have been part of a special order.   Exhibits included in the section “Designed for the West” look at  the various cross-cultural influences that intermingled in export  porcelain’s heyday. Mr Fuchs illustrates this point with a blue  and white teapot made in Arita, Japan, around 1700: “It was made  in Japan, for the Dutch, to imitate Chinese blue and white export  porcelain, and it’s decorated with Chinese landscape scenes,  including one depicting the outskirts of Peking, now Beijing,  with a pagoda. But the designs were actually copied from  illustrations in a Seventeenth Century Dutch book. It sort of  encapsulates all the different influences back and forth between  countries involved in the export trade. The globalism that we  talk about today is not all that new – all of these markets and  people were in some way linked 300 years ago.”   Winterthur Museum and Gardens is located six miles northwest  of Wilmington. For information, 800-448-3883 or  www.winterthur.org.          
						